• HOME
  • GALLERIES
    • PETS
    • CHILDREN
    • SENIORS
  • DREAM FACTORY PORTRAITS
    • WHAT IS A DREAM FACTORY PORTRAIT SESSION?
    • RAINBOW BRIDGE PORTRAITS
    • FANTASY CHILD PORTRAITS
  • PICTURES WITH SANTA
Stephanie Richer Photography Logo
  • HOW IT WORKS
  • WHAT IT COSTS
  • CONTACT
  • BLOG
MENU

Three Myths About AI – BUSTED!

Monday, May 12, 2025 | By: Stephanie Richer Photography

Share
A Friesian stallion running along a beach.

Sjabbe, a Friesian stallion, was trained on an AI model and a painterly portrait created of him running along a beach.

I have to admit, it can sometimes be a challenge keeping up with the changes in AI as they come fast and furious – but at the same time I find it exhilarating!

As a photographer, I think AI provides us with tools that can help us bring a photograph from ordinary to something magical.  However, not everyone shares that sentiment – in fact, some older photographers are downright hostile to the thought of incorporating AI into their workflow. I recently attended a workshop in Texas where photographers gathered for a host of different classes and behind closed doors there were mumblings and grumblings about us who dared to delve into AI, as if all we would do is sit in front of computers and not lift a camera.

Let me be frank, that attitude largely comes from, in my opinion, a lack of understanding about AI.  So, permit me to engage in a little myth busting:

“AI is easy – all you do is type a few words and push a button!”  

Ha, ha, ha!  If only!  It is true you can go to any AI image generator model and . . . oh, let me first explain that there is no one “AI.”  There are a number of AI models, like ChatGPT or Grok.  They are programmed to perform certain functions and among the more familiar are those that can generate images and videos.  Even Adobe, the maker of Photoshop, has its own called Firefly.

So, yes, you can access one, type a prompt – “make me an orange tabby cat” – and you will get what the model thinks is an orange tabby cat.  But let me give you a scenario.  Recently, I was told by a client that she really wanted a portrait of her dog enjoying a bubble bath with its head wrapped in a towel.  Here is an example of one of the portraits I created for her.

A Siberian Husky enjoying a bubble bath

Now let me tell you how that came about.  To begin, I do not have a bathroom setting in my studio.  The chance of a young Siberian Husky cooperating with both posing in a bubble bath AND wearing a towel wrapped like a turban on its head is very, very, VERY slim.  In fact, let’s just say if we set about to do such a photoshoot, there is no guarantee of success or what we could get would look pretty messy.

However, I suggested using AI as a tool to achieve the goal.  What I did was photograph the dog is various poses:  standing to the left, standing to the right, sitting and looking at the camera, etc.  With these photographs, I then trained an AI model to recognize a pattern that is not simply any Siberian Husky but is THIS Siberian Husky.  The model “learned” the pattern of the dog’s fur, even the pink spot on its nose.

But it does not stop there.  Now I am able to use that training as a character as well as other training the model had done and combine those with prompts and settings for which I developed a skill set to produce this sweet pup enjoying her bubble bath. In doing so, I went through several iterations of generating the composition and even then, used Photoshop to refine it.

Several iterations?  This brings me to my next myth to bust . . .

“AI is free – I went on to Chat GPT and made a picture of a cat!”

TINSTAAFL!

Come on, you have seen that acronym before – “there is no such thing as a free lunch.”  That holds true with AI as well. 

Certain programs like ChatGPT allow free use but with it being “free” comes a lack of sophistication in functionality; simple things are fine but a workflow as I described above requires much more computing power and so the company running the data centers and CPUs needed to handle that level of detail will charge you.  As with almost all types of applications, that charge is usually on a subscription basis.  For $xxx per year, each month a subscriber gets a certain number of computing units that do not accumulate, meaning any unused credits are not carried over in the new month.  Depending on the model used, some jobs “cost” more computing units than others – without getting into why, a video generated using the WAN 2.0 model costs less than one generated using the Kling model, but the Kling model does a better job for certain types of movement.  If you run out of credits in a given month, no worries as you can buy more. 

The bottom line is that if you are going to use robust and sophisticated technology , it comes with a price tag.

"AI is plagiarism and steals from others’ photos!"

Completely untrue.  Let me explain as simply as I can how AI image generation works.

Michelangelo, the 15th and 16th century artist, was once asked how he came about to create his famous sculpture of David, which took him three years to complete.  He answered:  “It is easy. You just chip away the stone that doesn’t look like David.”

A joke image of Michelangelo's David wearing sunglasses and making a peace sign.  No images of David were needed for training because it is a widely known statue.

I asked Grok to give David some sunglasses and be making a peace sign. No images were needed to train Grok because this statue is so familiar.

AI image generation works in a similar way in a process called diffusion.  The AI model knows, well, a lot.  AI models are trained on data sets and with the power of computing, that data set can be absolutely huge.  Think of what an AI model as being the block of marble that Michelangelo faced. 

The AI model looks at the parameters it has been given, say, a text prompt.  Let’s say a person merely typed “Make me a picture of an orange tabby cat.”  The AI model because of its training “knows” what a cat looks like, and what specifically a tabby cat looks like, and specifically what the color orange is. So, it uses its data set to see patterns that it “thinks” might fit the image of an orange tabby cat and creates its own.  Let me be clear – AI IMAGE GENERATION IS NOT A DIGITAL SCRAPBOOK.  It is not saying, “Oh, I’ll use this image I have found online of an orange tabby cat,” or “I’ll use this part from this image here and also use this part of this other image.”  What is returned is machine generated anew.

Make me an orange tabby cat - Grok gave me first a fat cat. Only a text prompt was used but this could look like anyone's cat.

With the same prompt, Grok also gave me a smoother and slimmer cat. Again, very simple prompt but this is not trained to produce the likeness of a specific cat.

Another way to think about how AI image generation works is to know how art students train.  Go to any art museum and often you will find people sitting in front of a piece by Picasso or Van Gogh, and they are drawing it.  No, they are not doing so to plagiarize the artist.  Instead, they are drawing it to study it, to understand how Van Gogh used the colors he did or how Picasso drew the outline of a woman’s hip.  That does not mean they will go one to create art “just like” the artist they studied.  Instead, they will develop their own style which will be influenced in various weights by the artists they studied. 

An AI image generator model is that art student.  As the person instructing it, I am using prompts and settings to influence how it will create an image and with that and the data it has collected, it will create what it thinks I want.  Sometimes it is spot on; more times, however, it requires more from me.  In fact, the challenge to me is to have what I want well pre-visualized in my head before expending computing units and giving the AI model its instructions.  And yes, sometimes the model will return an image that looks as if it has an artist’s signature in the corner – no, it did not copy an artist's work, it is just that it has seen a picture with something like that so often, it thinks it has to be part of what it makes, in essence “signing” its own work!

AN Ai-trained image of a silver Weimaraner lying on a beach.

A painterly portrait of my late dog, Zeke, made by training an AI model on his likeness.

Technology develops rapidly and it is hard to keep up with the changes.  I recently celebrated by 64th birthday and so in my lifetime computers have gone from machines that took up entire rooms of buildings and were operated by punch cards to a smartphone that I carry in my pocket and has thousands, if not millions, times more computing power than the computers when I was born. 

It is easy to dismiss new technology like AI with jokes and memes about “robot overlords” or face it with distrust.  As with anything else created by a human, it may be flawed but it definitely is controlled.  Any photographer claiming to be a professional should be developing the skills needed to do just that – control it, use it, create with it!

A photorealistic portrait of my late cat, Seamus. About two dozen photographs of Seamus taken by me were used to train the AI model to recreate the likeness of him.

Leave a comment

Leave this field empty
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Submit

0 Comments

Previous Post Next Post

Archive

2025 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

EXPLORE

Home About Blog  

LEARN

Process Pricing  

CONTACT

714-931-4517 426 N. Roane St Harriman, TN  
© Stephanie Richer Photography
Crafted by PhotoBiz
Stephanie Richer Photography Logo
CLOSE
  • HOME
  • GALLERIES
    • PETS
    • CHILDREN
    • SENIORS
  • DREAM FACTORY PORTRAITS
    • WHAT IS A DREAM FACTORY PORTRAIT SESSION?
    • RAINBOW BRIDGE PORTRAITS
    • FANTASY CHILD PORTRAITS
  • PICTURES WITH SANTA
  • HOW IT WORKS
  • WHAT IT COSTS
  • CONTACT
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT